Author Margaret A. Hagen has made her book “Whores of the Court: The Fraud of Psychiatric Testimony and the Rape of American Justice” available on her website. Here is a description of her work:
Professor Margaret A. Hagen
In this provocative and well-researched book, Margaret Hagen, Ph.D, reveals how expert psychological testimony is a total fraud, showing how the courts have increasingly embraced not a cutting-edge science but, instead, a discipline that represents a terrifying retreat into fantasy and hearsay; a discipline propelled by powerful propaganda, arrogance, and greed.
Dr. Hagen sounds a clarion wake-up call, offering some startling – and much-needed – recommendations about how we can reclaim our own ability to judge and supplying vital advice on how we can protect ourselves from the ravages of psychological testimony in our own lives.
“A damning indictment of the psychologizing – and undermining – of the American legal system. With righteous wrath and devastating wit, this sweeping critique should stir national debate.”
Please visit her website to download the book.
Our second award was received by V at 
WHOA. Awesome!!!
Comment by Rj — February 10, 2009 @ 10:08 am
A mother’s journey for justice
Part 1
By BRANDON A. PERRY
Published: Thursday, February 5, 2009 4:09 PM CST
Following a recent hearing inside a Marion County paternity court,
Tracie Nelson learned that things would not change anytime soon: Her
daughter still won’t be coming home.
While leaving the court chamber with her attorney, Nelson appears
frustrated and sad.
“I’m so tired, I don’t know what else to do,” Nelson says with tears
in her eyes as she is embraced by her mother, Minnie Blaylock.
Nelson has learned that an ex-boyfriend will retain custody of her
seven-year-old daughter, Kay. An ugly custody battle involving
allegations of molestation and mental illness continues.
However, as the two discuss the case with attorney Dana Childress-
Jones, Nelson recovers her strength, recognizing that she can’t give
up even if the odds seemed stacked against her.
“If I do not fight for Kay, who will?” said Nelson.
The challenge
When most Americans find themselves involved in the court system,
they expect justice to be administered based on the law and
compassion.
Nelson, however, says she and Kay have not received anything
resembling justice.
According to Nelson, biased judges and attorneys have refused to
remove Kay from the father’s home, despite serious allegations of
abuse in that household. Nelson, who raised Kay for the first six
years of her life, believes custody should be returned to her or to
Blaylock, Kay’s maternal grandmother.
“Right now all we’re asking is for someone to stand up and do what’s
in the best interest of Kay,” said Blaylock. “She’s a wonderful
child, and deserves to be in an environment where she is safe and
cared for with love.”
Nelson wants to share Kay’s case with the community because, she
stated, she’s not only fighting for her daughter, but hopes to
provide a testimony to help parents who find themselves in similar
situations.
The beginning
In May, 2001, Kay was born to Tracie Nelson and ex-boyfriend Billy
Dupree (Dupree refused to speak with the Recorder regarding the
case). From Kay’s birth Nelson had sole legal custody of her.
Although the relationship between Nelson and Dupree ended, Nelson
said she understood the importance of a father’s presence in a
child’s life and encouraged Dupree to visit Kay.
In September 2004, Kay began exhibiting unexplained sexual behavior,
which a nurse at Community North Hospital later stated was very
unusual for a girl her age. This puzzled Nelson because she knew her
daughter had no reason to be with any man other than her father, who
occasionally had Kay at his home for overnight visitations.
In written documents submitted in court, Nelson said Dupree “was very
guarded when I spoke with him about these concerns, and told me if I
kept looking I would find what I was `looking for.’”
Family members wanted Nelson to contact child authorities immediately
to investigate Dupree, but Nelson said she urged caution, wanting to
give Dupree a chance to defend himself and help in discovering if
anyone did molest Kay.
Nelson took Kay to a therapist, and expressed her concerns to
paternity court Judge Alicia Gooden, who suspended Dupree’s overnight
visitations. Then, for the first time, Dupree expressed an interest
in having custody of Kay.
According to Nelson, Kay later told a forensic investigator, child
psychologist and police detective that Dupree had touched her
inappropriately, and that Dupree’s stepson had been “playing house”
on her.
An employee for the Marion County Prosecutor’s office, who has to
remain anonymous, believes Kay’s story is legitimate, but could not
take action due to the custody dispute.
In August 2007, following a hearing, Gooden granted custody of Kay to
Dupree.
The railroad
Nelson believes Gooden’s decision was based on a conflict of interest.
She said Kim Bacon, Dupree’s attorney, was given preferential
treatment during the hearing because she is a pro temp judge in
Gooden’s paternity court. She also claims that Bacon’s boyfriend is
Dupree’s best friend. Nelson says she has been a target ever since
she filed a complaint against Bacon with the Indiana Bar Association.
“The judge’s decision was based, not on the best interest of Kay, but
on Gooden’s bias against me and her relationship with Bacon,” said
Nelson.
Bacon and Dupree have declined to talk publicly. When contacted by
the Recorder to get Dupree’s version of events, Bacon firmly ruled
out a discussion about the case.
“What we’re seeing right now is a situation where the private
business of a seven-year-old girl is being dragged out into the
public, and that’s not right,” Bacon said. “Neither my client nor I
will be a part of that. We decline to comment.”
According to court records, Dupree has strongly denied any
allegations of abuse, and he and Bacon assert that Nelson is mentally
and financially unstable. They also believe that Nelson has coached
Kay into saying certain things to bolster her case.
Nelson’s attorney, Childress-Jones, requested a change of judge, and
Kay’s case was passed to Judge Gary Miller. Nelson alleges that
Miller appeared to be fair at first, but after speaking with Gooden
and Bacon, has refused to grant even temporary custody to Nelson,
despite the investigation into alleged abuse.
To date, Nelson has only occasional supervised visits with Kay that
she must pay for, and Kay is not allowed to keep gifts or other items.
Nelson says she has had several attorneys helping her, simply because
they get hopeless after a short time working on her case. Shortly
after Nelson lost custody of Kay, one former attorney, Dylan Vigh,
stated on WTLC-AM (1310) “Afternoons with Amos” show that her case
was “by far” one of the “greatest injustices” he has ever seen, and
that Nelson has been “railroaded” in the courtroom.
Still, Nelson says she is not surrendering the fight to get Kay back
home. She is seeking to move her case to the court of a third judge
with no connections to Gooden. She is also seeking removal of the
Guardian Ad Litem (GAL), a representative appointed to serve as a
nonbiased guardian of a child in a custody dispute. Nelson says the
GAL has not acted in Kay’s best interest.
“I have a divine right, as Kay’s mother, to protect her,” Nelson
said. “All I’m trying to do is get her life back to normal and keep
her safe.”
Coming in Part 2: A closer look into the case.
Note: Kay is not the child’s
http://indianapolis recorder. com/articles/ 2009/02/06/ news/local/ news02.
txt
I thought you might be interested in this.
Comment by TeardropsForKatelynn — February 11, 2009 @ 4:46 pm
[...] that California Whore of the Court (who happens to have a JD also…gag, gag, gag). She was featured in a story from California [...]
Pingback by ‘Grandparent Alienation’ New Syndrome? Janelle Burrill is back in the House | Divorce Information — April 17, 2009 @ 8:33 am
[...] that California Whore of the Court (who happens to have a JD also…gag, gag, gag). She was featured in a story from California [...]
Pingback by Grandparent Alienation’ New Syndrome? Janelle Burrill is back in the House « A Human Rights Issue-Custodial Justice — April 20, 2009 @ 12:04 am
[...] that California Whore of the Court (who happens to have a JD also…gag, gag, gag). She was featured in a story from California [...]
Pingback by Grandparent Alienation’ New Syndrome? Janelle Burrill is back in the House « “I will not SHUT UP or give up - and I WON’T go away!! — April 20, 2009 @ 12:06 am
[...] that California Whore of the Court (who happens to have a JD also…gag, gag, gag). She was featured in a story from California [...]
Pingback by Grandparent Alienation’ New Syndrome? Janelle Burrill is back in the House « Battered Mothers Rights - A Human Rights Issue — April 20, 2009 @ 12:11 am
[...] People are learning the truth of the “Parental Alienation” scam meant to support the Whores of the Court by the abusers who hire them. Your cult even had to run to Canada to hold a conference on [...]
Pingback by Happy Abusers Awareness Day! « RightsForMothers.com — April 25, 2009 @ 1:52 pm
[...] People are learning the truth of the “Parental Alienation” scam meant to support the Whores of the Court by the abusers who hire them. Your cult even had to run to Canada to hold a conference on [...]
Pingback by Happy Abusers Awareness Day! « “I will not SHUT UP or give up - and I WON’T go away!! — April 25, 2009 @ 3:24 pm
[...] People are learning the truth of the “Parental Alienation” scam meant to support the Whores of the Court by the abusers who hire them. Your cult even had to run to Canada to hold a conference on [...]
Pingback by Happy Abusers Awareness Day! « A Human Rights Issue-Custodial Justice — April 25, 2009 @ 4:19 pm
[...] People are learning the truth of the “Parental Alienation” scam meant to support the Whores of the Court by the abusers who hire them. Your cult even had to run to Canada to hold a conference on [...]
Pingback by Happy Abusers Awareness Day! « Battered Mothers Rights - A Human Rights Issue — April 25, 2009 @ 4:26 pm
[...] as expert witnesses are repeatedly characterized as (in the words of one recent author) “Whores of the Court.” However, scholars have published little systematically gathered data about why attorneys [...]
Pingback by Courtroom Whores: Testimony for Sale « RightsForMothers.com — July 16, 2009 @ 7:23 pm
Janelle Burrill is being investigated by BBS and Dept of Consumer Affairs – Division of Investigation.
Real Evidence has exposed her fraud and criminal conduct in the courts. If you have evidence of Burrills lying, manipulations and fraudulent practices pls send them asap to
Senior Investigator, Department of Consumer Affairs
Division of Investigation, 444 North 3rd Street, Suite 201, Sacramento, CA 95811
Sacramento & Placer County District Attorneys have all this real evidence and are also investigating criminal conduct, purjury by Burrill. Please be factual and provide real evidence to all if you are Burrills victim.
Justice will prevail – Burrill’s LCSW licence will be revoked eventually. She is truly exposed now with real evidence. Supplement the current investigation and provide true facts to the investigator. All of Burrills so called “PAS BS reports” from her career will be thrown out along with her. The AG’s accusation will become public as soon as it is filed.
Civil Lawsuit Attorneys (Class Action Lawsuit Opportunity) – Pls check the status for Jannelle Burrill LCS 16216 at BBS Licence verification. Her assets are as big as her fraud and criminal conduct. Vicitms of Burrill – Help is on the way.
Comment by Seeking Justice — October 31, 2009 @ 2:25 pm